The Divergence of Sex from Space
This essay examines the visible expression of sex in the built environment through critical theory and a series of case studies spanning the post-war period to the present. It asks how shifts in sexual attitudes have intersected with architectural change, and which kinds of spaces have become most charged with sexual meaning. In doing so, it argues that architecture does not merely contain social norms: it helps to organise, reinforce and obscure them.
i.
Feminist and queer theory are central to this inquiry because the city is not only a material environment but also a political one. Urban life is structured by visible infrastructures and by invisible networks — networks that shape relationships between bodies, buildings and social expectations. It is through these overlapping systems that sexuality becomes regulated, displaced or made legible.
Nancy Duncan’s thinking on public and private space is especially useful here. Her work illuminates the ways in which the designation and use of space can produce social politics, and how architecture often reproduces hegemonic orders by sorting people into fixed categories. This essay asks whether space might instead be provoked into becoming polymorphous, in a way more analogous to sexuality itself. If, as Montgomery writes of Freud and Stopes, sexual satisfaction was understood as central to human happiness, then why has the design of the built environment so rarely acknowledged that claim.1
1. Montgomery, 2017.